"Kathryn Cramer has been linking my LJ to my full name on wikis and in other people's blog comments "

[Coffeeandink's full name redacted by archivist] owes me an apology. Anyone interested in what I might have actually done to give such overblown offense should look HERE and HERE. And in case you are interested, HERE are my last 500 Wikipedia edits and a case study on pseudonymity.

(I’ve seen strange tactics for protecting one’s Internet handle before, but I’m quite nonplussed at the tactic of flaming people who have actually acquiesced to requests for concealment of identity. What was she thinking?!?) 

Is there some key piece of evidence that I am unaware of that would suggest that what [Coffeeandink's first name redacted by archivist] says is actually TRUE? Do I have a Doppelgänger I am unaware of? -- KC, 3/2/09

Can I just say, for the record, that I think it is wildly unethical to flame, under a fake name that you refuse to associate with your real name and history, your former boss and people you formerly worked with at a company, especially like claiming to take the moral high ground on an issue like, say, race. I am appalled, just really appalled, & even more appalled by people who think this is a legitimate use of an alias. It is not.